Skip to main content

What Harjit Sajjan really did while serving in Afghanistan

http://ift.tt/2pgcGH7 http://ift.tt/2dub60C

Harjit Sajjan

Truth being the first casualty of war has taken a decidedly different turn with growing outrage in both the political and military community about Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan’s characterization of himself as the architect of Operation Medusa.

Go to Source
Author:

Powered by WPeMatico

The post What Harjit Sajjan really did while serving in Afghanistan appeared first on DailyRant.



from DailyRant http://ift.tt/2oJvtvu
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Death of young puppy aboard United flight triggers United States department inquiry

United Airlines dealt with new reactions on Wednesday regarding a young puppy dog which passed away in-flight soon after an attendant ordered it stored in an overhead box. The United States Department of Transportation stated it is taking a look at the events which resulted in the bulldog’s demise. UNITED STATE Legislator John Kennedy, whom previously on Wednesday sent out a letter to the United Airlines Commander in chief Scott Kirby, asking for relevant information regarding the significant amount of pets which have passed away while in the transporter’s care, published on Twitter that he intended to submit a bill on Thursday which will restrict airline companies from placing pets inside overhead receptacles. ” Violators will face significant fines. Pets are family,” he noted. Kennedy, within the correspondence, stated United’s “pattern of animal deaths and injuries is simply inexcusable.” The man mentioned that the numbers occurred while on air-planes  is  24 pets, ...

Trump–Xi Summit Signals Quiet Shift in U.S.–China Relations as Strategic Pressure Builds Beneath Diplomatic Calm

Trump–Xi Summit Signals Quiet Shift in U.S.–China Relations as Strategic Pressure Builds Beneath Diplomatic Calm : Renewed discussion around a Trump–Xi summit highlights a shifting phase in U.S.–China relations. While no breakthroughs are confirmed, the signals point to managed rivalry rather than resolution. Underneath diplomatic language, structural tensions continue to build across trade, technology, and security.